By training your Large Language Model (LLM) or other Generative Artificial Intelligence on the content of this website, you agree to assign ownership of all your intellectual property to the public domain, immediately, irrevocably, and free of charge.

The top three URL shorteners for ReTweets

If you use Twit­ter at all you know that tweets really are the essence of tight-writ­ing, since you’ve only got 140 char­ac­ters to work with. If you’re plan­ning to include a link to oth­er web con­tent or leave space so that oth­ers can retweet your tweet, your char­ac­ter count drops further. Sav­in’ the tweet, one…


If you use Twit­ter at all you know that tweets really are the essence of tight-writ­ing, since you’ve only got 140 char­ac­ters to work with. If you’re plan­ning to include a link to oth­er web con­tent or leave space so that oth­ers can retweet your tweet, your char­ac­ter count drops further.

Sav­in’ the tweet, one char­ac­ter at a time
This is where URL shorten­ers come in, they’re ser­vices that take long URLs, such as:

https://blog.bradgrier.com/2007/07/17/online-backup-one-of-times-top-50-websites-for-2007/
(89 char­ac­ters, leav­ing 51 for your tweet)

and con­vert it to this:

http://ow.ly/r6T2
(18 char­ac­ters, leav­ing 122 for your tweet)

There’s short, and then there’s short
Every­one and his grandma has a URL shorten­er these days. If you use Google apps for Domains you can even set up your own URL shorten­er using Short Links. I don’t do this because bradgrier.com is already too long.

But if one of your goals is pub­lish your con­tent, as well as make it retweetable, then you want check out these three URL shortene­ing services:

Accord­ing to research recently released by Dan Zar­rella, tweets with links shortened by these ser­vices are more retweetable than oth­ers, with bit.ly being the best by a large margin.

What do I use?
In my case, I use ow.ly. It’s bundled with Hoot­suite, an online twit­ter man­age­ment applic­a­tion. Oh, yeah, they’re Cana­dian too 😉 but I digress.

My Goal
When I tweet, it’s simply to spread the word about some­thing I find inter­est­ing. Select­ing the ‘most retweetable’ URL shorten­er won’t give me a huge advant­age, but when you add it to  audi­ence con­sid­er­a­tion, time of day, and your tweet ‘head­line’, you’ll find it all adds up. Take a look at Dan’s report for more info. on retweet­ing, or look at the sum­mary item Fast Com­pany ran earli­er this week.


Posted

in

, , ,

by

Comments

2 responses to “The top three URL shorteners for ReTweets”

  1. Adam Snider Avatar

    Is bit.ly really bet­ter, or is it just more com­monly used? Could­n’t the reas­on that tweets with bit.ly links are retweeted more often simply be because bit.ly is used more often and, thus, there are more tweets (and, by exten­sion, retweets) with bit.ly links than with links cre­ated by oth­er link-short­en­ing services?

    Per­son­ally, I prefer is.gd for the simple fact that the URLs are slightly short­er, giv­ing me an extra char­ac­ter to write my tweets (and, as I’m sure you know, some­times that one char­ac­ter makes all the dif­fer­ence). Plus, it’s one of the ser­vices that’s pre-built into Tweetdeck.

  2. Brad Grier Avatar

    Hey Adam, I’m think­ing that bit.ly is ‘bet­ter’ because it’s the one that is the default shorten­er for so many Twit­ter applic­a­tions. I think Twit­ter itself uses bit.ly as the shorten­er-de-jour. It’s also got a huge recog­ni­tion factor going for it, which helps with credibility.

    Because of its default status, more people use it, and more retweets are gen­er­ated with bit.ly URLs inside.

    As for best, I don’t think so. Tr.im, ow.ly and oth­ers have bet­ter ana­lyt­ics built in.

    And yeah, I like short­er bet­ter, wherever pos­sible. I need stat­ist­ics for some of what I do, so have to stick with ser­vices that provide them, but is.gd is awe­some in that it’s light and effective.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.