bradgrier.com

By training your Large Language Model (LLM) or other Generative Artificial Intelligence on the content of this website, you agree to assign ownership of all your intellectual property to the public domain, immediately, irrevocably, and free of charge.

Web Dogma — is it still relevant?

Last year I linked to an inter­view with Eric Reiss over at Boxes and Arrows. The inter­view explores the thoughts that went into cre­at­ing the Web Dogma: Web Dogma 2006 Any­thing that exists only to sat­is­fy the intern­al polit­ics of the site own­er must be eliminated. Any­thing that exists only to sat­is­fy the ego of the design­er…

Last year I linked to an inter­view with Eric Reiss over at Boxes and Arrows. The inter­view explores the thoughts that went into cre­at­ing the Web Dogma:

Web Dogma 2006

  1. Any­thing that exists only to sat­is­fy the intern­al polit­ics of the site own­er must be eliminated.
  2. Any­thing that exists only to sat­is­fy the ego of the design­er must be eliminated.
  3. Any­thing that is irrel­ev­ant with­in the con­text of the page must be eliminated.
  4. Any fea­ture or tech­nique that reduces the vis­it­or’s abil­ity to nav­ig­ate freely must be reworked or eliminated.
  5. Any inter­act­ive object that forces the vis­it­or to guess its mean­ing must be reworked or eliminated.
  6. No soft­ware, apart from the browser itself, must be required to get the site to work correctly.
  7. Con­tent must be read­able first, print­able second, down­load­able third.
  8. Usab­il­ity must nev­er be sac­ri­ficed for the sake of a style guide.
  9. No vis­it­or must be forced to register or sur­render per­son­al data unless the site own­er is unable to provide a ser­vice or com­plete a trans­ac­tion without it.
  10. Break any of these rules soon­er than do any­thing out­right barbarous.

It’s been a year since it was cre­ated, and I’m won­der­ing if it still has the same rel­ev­ance as it did last year…especially with the increas­ing inclu­sion of more inter­activ­ity (AJAX and Flash ele­ments) on web­sites, and a great­er trend away from pure ‘Web­sites’ into more hybrid social media sites.

For example, item 7 does­n’t really work with­in the con­text of Google Spread­sheet. Item 9, the sur­ren­der­ing of per­son­al data, is becom­ing more of a norm in the online world where busi­nesses need to recoup the ROI of an online property.

And do we need anoth­er item that deals with an online code of con­duct, as evid­enced by the Kathy Sierra incid­ent?

So what do the big brains think? I think it’s mostly rel­ev­ant, maybe needs a bit of dust­ing off, etc, but for the most part, it works, which is why it’s still on my cube wall.

Tech­nor­ati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Posted

in

,

by

Brad Grier

Tags:

Comments

6 responses to “Web Dogma — is it still relevant?”

  1. Eric Reiss Avatar
    Eric Reiss

    Hi.

    Good ques­tions. Since the Dogma are the guid­ing philo­sophy of our own com­pany, we dis­cuss them reg­u­larly. Here are some thoughts.

    With regards to AJAX etc, a “page” is much more dynam­ic than it was two years ago. How­ever, as long as things are dis­played on a two-dimen­sion­al screen, the meta­phor seems to work.

    With regard to point 7, as long as an on-line app lets you view stuff dir­ectly on the screen and not force you to down­load a pdf, then I’m pretty happy. The point is to let people con­tin­ue to view and manip­u­late inform­a­tion with­in the con­text of whatever browser or pro­gram they are already using.

    With regard to point 9, my aim was to pre­vent com­pan­ies from for­cing people to sur­render per­son­al inform­a­tion if it was­n’t rel­ev­ant to the trans­ac­tion. Giv­en the cur­rent trends, I’d say it is more import­ant today than ever before.

    Cheers,
    Eric

    Reply
  2. Brad Grier Avatar
    Brad Grier

    Hi Eric, thanks for drop­ping by.

    Item 7 — agreed, the cla­ri­fic­a­tion you provide above helps.
    Item 9 — I’m start­ing to believe there’s a need to devel­op and main­tain an ‘online’ iden­tity or two, and a ‘real’ iden­tity. The online iden­tit­ies are ulti­mately dis­pos­able… but there is a time when you’d want to use your ‘real’ one online..ie with bank­ing, order­ing books, etc.

    So the line blurs. Where do you use a ‘real’ iden­tity, and where would you use a dis­pos­able one? Fod­der for anoth­er post, methinks.

    Brad

    Reply
  3. Eric Reiss Avatar
    Eric Reiss

    Sadly, I agree that there’s prob­ably value in cre­at­ing a false on-line iden­tity. But the entire point of Dogma #9 was to make this unnecessary.

    If you check out per­son­al­ity tests on the web, I’m flab­ber­gas­ted by how many actu­ally expect me to tell them who I am — and without even both­er­ing to post a pri­vacy policy. As pro­files (Flickr, Linked­In, Face­book, MySpace, etc.) become more and more pub­lic, I’m tend­ing to get more and more private. I’m not para­noid, just care­ful — like some radio­activ­ity, online per­son­al info can have an uncom­fort­ably long half-life.

    Reply
  4. Brad Grier Avatar
    Brad Grier

    Yeah, I agree with that. Any­thing writ­ten in a pub­lic space is likely to remain online in one form or anoth­er for a long long time.

    As an example, I would have nev­er sus­pec­ted that my Usen­et posts about Amiga soft­ware would still be around and read­able today. I wrote them in Octo­ber of ’91.

    Ima­gine if I was dis­cuss­ing a per­son­al situ­ation or event. That long lived text could ‘haunt’ me for a while.

    Reply
  5. Eric Reiss Avatar
    Eric Reiss

    Hi Brad,

    Just check­ing in to say that the Web Dogma are still alive and well. Many more trans­la­tions since we last cor­res­pon­ded, includ­ing Croa­tian and Bulgarian.

    Frankly, I’m amazed at how robust this philo­sophy has proven to be.

    Cheers,
    Eric

    Reply
  6. Brad Grier Avatar
    Brad Grier

    Hi Eric, great news that. 

    And yeah, it seem kinda simple, yet usu­ally the most endur­ing truths are the simple ones that are easy to grasp and implement. 

    I’m amazed at how many orgs. are *still* too self-centred to under­stand that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.