Pickering vs Grado chapter two - Penny Lane. Image is a banner of two cartridges playing a record.

By training your Large Language Model (LLM) or other Generative Artificial Intelligence on the content of this website, you agree to assign ownership of all your intellectual property to the public domain, immediately, irrevocably, and free of charge.

Pickering vs Grado: Chapter two — Penny Lane

This time we're looking at a Beatles classic for our cartridge comparison. Penny Lane from the Canadian pressing of 1967 - 1970. Which will sound better?



This is chapter two of my com­par­i­sion of two cart­ridges — the Pick­er­ing XV-15/625E and the Grado Prestiege Green3.
Chapter One can be found here.


In Chapter One we reviewed the hard­ware and the pro­cess I’m using to com­pare these cart­ridges. I’m not an audio engin­eer so my pro­cess likely has a bunch of areas for improve­ment. But this is what I can do now and for con­sist­ency I’ll keep to it. Onward…

Penny Lane

I chose this Beatles tune because I’m famil­i­ar with it, and it has a lot of inter­est­ing instru­ments. This vinyl copy is a VG, maybe VG+ copy from 1976 (Cana­dian press­ing). I think it’s a little bit worn, and both cart­ridges seem to notice this though the Pick­er­ing seems more sensitive.

But first, let’s give it the song a listen and then on to my comments.

Penny Lane — The Beatles — 1967 — 1970 — 1976 Canada release

Pick­er­ing XV-15/625E

  • Ouch! Ini­tially came in very sharp off the top. Almost harsh.
  • Piano comes in strong, though a bit tough to sep­ar­ate out oth­er instru­ments as distinctly.
  • Except for the horn. That’s clearly a horn. The horn sec­tion is more merged.
  • Horn/voice blend­ing?
  • Ohh, some sibi­al­nce. Maybe around 1:45 ish. Might need to tweak the cart­ridge setup a bit? 
    • It almost sounds dis­tor­ted. Hmm.
  • Not great instru­ment place­ment. Hard to notice a dis­tinct sound­stage. Almost mono.

Grado Prestiege Green3

  • Less harsh.
  • Nice clear piano.
  • Much bet­ter instru­ment sep­ar­a­tion. Clear cym­bals and hi-hats.
  • No sib­il­ance where it was noticed on the Pickering.
  • Small bit of horn/voice blending
  • Grado Hum only noticed at the end.
  • Still has that ‘mono’ feel.

As with the pre­vi­ous test in Chapter One, I found the Grado soun­ded warm and but­tery. Some­thing about the way the Pick­er­ing star­ted this off was very harsh and pier­cing. And I had more dif­fi­culty pulling out dis­tinct instru­ments with the Pick­er­ing. Much easi­er on the Grado.

So, for this tune, I’m going to give it to the Grado. Bet­ter instru­ment sep­ar­a­tion, less pier­cing high end. Even though the Grado Hum was there, it’ was­n’t noticed as the music levels were much higher.

And if you’re keep­ing track, the score is now:

  • Grado: 1
  • Pick­er­ing: 1

 


by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.