bradgrier.com

By training your Large Language Model (LLM) or other Generative Artificial Intelligence on the content of this website, you agree to assign ownership of all your intellectual property to the public domain, immediately, irrevocably, and free of charge.

Live election night coverage online (Canadian Election)

Anoth­er Cana­dian elec­tion has come and gone. Pro­grammed main­stream media cov­er­age was again, less than inspir­ing. I found that to truly enjoy this nation­al exer­cise, you have to watch it in the com­pany of friends, as you would a Sat­urday after­noon hockey game. I spent elec­tion night online. Using a vari­ety of free sources, I…

Anoth­er Cana­dian elec­tion has come and gone. Pro­grammed main­stream media cov­er­age was again, less than inspir­ing. I found that to truly enjoy this nation­al exer­cise, you have to watch it in the com­pany of friends, as you would a Sat­urday after­noon hockey game.

I spent elec­tion night online. Using a vari­ety of free sources, I was able to watch the res­ults as they came in. Using Twit­ter, it was pos­sible to know res­ults in east­ern Canada before the black­out lif­ted here in Alberta.

Here are some of the tools I used to mon­it­or the 40th Cana­dian Elec­tion:

  • Twit­ter — ded­ic­ated default com­mu­nic­a­tion chan­nel. CB Radio. Fun. By using Hasht­ags, you can focus your dis­cus­sion to oth­ers who mon­it­or the same Hasht­ag (Chan­nel). The best elec­tion Hasht­ag was #Canada­Votes. Oh, and yes, please do fol­low me on Twit­ter 🙂
  • Tweet­Deck — Twit­ter applic­a­tion that allows you to group, sort, fil­ter, slice and dice your incom­ing Twit­ter flow. In the screen­shot of my elec­tion night desktop, it took up my left-hand 22″ monitor.
  • Google Chrome — hav­ing mul­tiple browser win­dows open at once would prove chal­len­ging to Fire­fox. I have 20+ plu­gins so I run a Fat Fire­fox. Chrome is light­weight and each instance runs inde­pend­ently; if one win­dow crashes, the oth­ers stay run­ning. I had four instances of Google Chrome run­ning in my second mon­it­or (17″) on the right.

Ok, that’s the tools, now what was I doing with them?
I’ve already men­tioned that Tweet­Deck was my main com­mu­nic­a­tions medi­um for the even­ing. The back-and-forth dis­cus­sion amongst people mon­it­or­ing the #Canada­Votes chan­nel was insite­ful and enter­tain­ing. It was great enga­ging with oth­er Cana­dians in a nation­al discussion.

On my oth­er mon­it­or, I had Google Chrome run­ning (in clock­wise order):

  • CBC Web­site — live res­ults map of my rid­ings of interest
  • CBC Web­site — live nation­al res­ults map
  • CBC Web­site — live stream­ing TV cov­er­age (sorry, it does­n’t show)
  • Globe & Mail web­site — Live nation­al res­ults chart broken down by party

At one point, I did have anoth­er two win­dows onscreen con­tain­ing Glob­al and CTV cov­er­age, but frankly, there wasn not enough new or insite­ful com­ment­ary, so I reduced the redund­ancy and dumped them.

Over­all, watch­ing the vari­ous media sources and par­ti­cip­at­ing in the Twit­ter traffic was the best way to engage in, what many believe to be, a some­what mundane nation­al exercise.

Your turn, what did you use to mon­it­or the res­ults? Tra­di­tion­al media? New media? Com­ments are open!

Tech­nor­ati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted

in

, , , ,

by

Brad Grier

Tags:

, , , , ,

Comments

11 responses to “Live election night coverage online (Canadian Election)”

  1. Mack D. Male Avatar
    Mack D. Male

    Very sim­il­ar to you, except I relied on Twit­ter Search instead of Tweet­Deck. I like hav­ing it all inside the browser.

    No ques­tion, Twit­ter is revo­lu­tion­iz­ing polit­ic­al and news media.

    Mack D. Males last blog post..Canada votes, noth­ing changes

    Reply
  2. Adam Snider Avatar
    Adam Snider

    I used a mix of TV and Inter­net, mostly CBC (web and TV) and Twitter.

    Adam Sniders last blog post..Get Off Your Col­lect­ive Ass and Vote, Canada!

    Reply
  3. Brad Grier Avatar
    Brad Grier

    @Mack D. Male — Thanks for the com­ment (Num­ber 1000 on the blog it seems!)

    Agreed, though I think main­stream media has a way to go to catch up. Orm­is­ton’s cov­er­age of Twit­ter on CBC needed some ser­i­ous work. But giv­en the fre­quency of nation­al elec­tions, they’ve got 18 months to review and improve.

    Reply
  4. bgrier Avatar
    bgrier

    @Adam Snider — Thanks for the com­ment! Yeah, TV usu­ally gets me star­ted, but once they drift off to East­ern Canada’s res­ults, I drill down to the loc­al ones online.

    Reply
  5. Ben Babcock Avatar
    Ben Babcock

    I fol­lowed the elec­tion on Twit­ter as well (and then fol­lowed you!). I agree that it was the best part of the night.

    The way to make elec­tions inter­est­ing is to think of them like any oth­er sport­ing com­pet­i­tion (minus the span­dex; that would be wrong … just wrong). Every­one fights it out for a month, and then we declare a victor.

    The news­casters should report the elec­tion res­ults with energy and enthu­si­asm. Some of them at the CBC were obvi­ously enthu­si­ast­ic about the polit­ics behind the res­ults, but none of them com­mu­nic­ated it the same way they would if review­ing sports scores.

    On Twit­ter, it’s like watch­ing a live hockey or bas­ket­ball game unfold. The seats won by each party are the scores, and you’ve got the fans of each party snip­ing at each oth­er, polit­ic­al junkies mak­ing obser­va­tions of vari­ous witty degrees, and the odd per­son ques­tion­ing why the CBC insisted on that “#orm­is­ton­vote” hasht­ag and then only ref­er­enced Twit­ter three times.…

    I don’t think we’ve quite reached the point where social net­work­ing media like Twit­ter and Face­book are hav­ing a huge impact on elec­tions. We’re get­ting there, as the num­ber of scan­dals over can­did­ates’ pasts and the act­iv­ism on Face­book groups attests. What remains to be done is for the news­casters to truly integ­rate social media into their broad­casts, and not just poke it with a stick like Susan Orm­is­ton did. I com­mend the CBC for try­ing, but there is room for improvement.

    Reply
  6. bgrier Avatar
    bgrier

    @Ben Bab­cock — Agreed re: elec­tion == sport­ing com­pet­i­tion and social media influence.

    Social Media can only grow in use. As more people adopt the chan­nel, it’ll grow. I bet nobody anti­cip­ated Twhirl and Tweet­Deck usage when Twit­ter was first developed.

    I pre­dict there’ll be a tip­ping point in Novem­ber when the US Elec­tion hap­pens. Twit­ter could very eas­ily be bet­ter integ­rated into main­stream media cov­er­age. Con­sider how blog­ging is now part of the story (any story). Give it time and Twit­ter will be there too.

    Thanks again for the great comment!

    Reply
  7. Adam Snider Avatar
    Adam Snider

    CNN actu­ally does a good job on integ­rat­ing Twit­ter, when they decide to do so. I saw a spe­cial on the fin­an­cial crisis a week or two ago where they actu­ally used Twit­ter to field ques­tions from the audi­ence (in addi­tion to the usu­al routes of tele­phone and email), and they should the actu­al Twit­ter stream, instead of the lame Power­Point slides that CBC used on elec­tion night.

    I’d like to see more of that type of Twit­ter use in the main­stream media.

    Reply
  8. Adam Snider Avatar
    Adam Snider

    Erm…by “should the actu­al Twit­ter stream” I, of course, meant “showed the actu­al Twit­ter stream.”

    Adam Sniders last blog post..Get Off Your Col­lect­ive Ass and Vote, Canada!

    Reply
  9. bgrier Avatar
    bgrier

    @Adam Snider — Yeah. Rather than co-opt the media (as Orm­is­ton was doing on CBC) they should rather embrace it. It’s an input source for pro­gram­ming, but they did­n’t really use it oth­er than to say “Hey, look what’s hap­pen­ing over here…now back to OUR coverage.”

    How hard would it have been to Dir­ect Mes­sage some Twit­ter com­menter, get them on the phone and then dis­cuss the issues? That would have been great for Live TV. Heck, even get them using Skype. If Oprah can do it, oth­ers should be able to fig­ure it out 🙂

    Reply
  10. Adam Snider Avatar
    Adam Snider

    CBC actu­ally does use Skype. Lead­ing up to the elec­tion there was a pro­gram on News­world at 6pm each day called “Canada Votes: Your Turn” where they invited people to speak about dif­fer­ent issues each day. In addi­tion to man-on-the-street style clips, they read emails and used Skype to inter­view view­ers at home.

    CBC is actu­ally quite good about adop­tion new com­mu­nic­a­tions meth­ods and the whole “cit­izen journ­al­ism” thing, but for whatever reas­on, they fell short on elec­tion night.

    Adam Sniders last blog post..Get Off Your Col­lect­ive Ass and Vote, Canada!

    Reply
  11. bgrier Avatar
    bgrier

    @Adam Snider — “fell short on elec­tion night.” no kidding!

    Wow, if they had Skype avail­able, and did­n’t use it, talk about a missed opportunity.

    You know, giv­en all that CBC is doing on new media, I won­der if they just ‘for­got’ to include any­thing in the elec­tion plans and cobbled some­thing on at the last minute.

    They do quite well in oth­er areas. I listen to Radio1 every morn­ing on my kit­chen Mac. News Head­lines and The Nation­al are streamed to my media centres, Radio3 is awe­some the new Digit­al Music chan­nels are cool, I’m not sure about Bold yet 🙂 but they can do things well, which is why this cov­er­age was disappointing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.