With the recent launch of Melcrum’s new social media site for communications professionals, I’m beginning to really start evaluating which networks I associate myself with. There are many, and to fully participate in any of them does take time. And, like you, I’m a busy guy. Evaluating each site based on my needs will show me where I should be spending my time.
I’ll get into the rest of my evaluation criteria in a moment, but let me talk for a moment about what I think is the key evaluation criteria: a social media site’s reputation — because by association and extension, that reputation can rub off on you. I’m thinking carefully about my network associations because using a particular network can colour how others perceive you as a communicator, or as a member of online society in general
We’ve already developed some stereotypes: Slashdotters are Linux tech-heads. Diggers are malcontents, 2nd Lifers are just plain weird, Twitters, nobody gets..etc. Heh, these aren’t my personal opinions, as I dabble in all of them, but they’re comments I’ve heard from others.
So, by using a particular social media network, as much as when you choose your clothing for a social/networking function, you are projecting a particular persona, a particular character, so you’d better be careful which one you choose. People are already making up their minds about these sites, and about you.
Other criteria I’m using to evaluate my networks:
- Who’s there. Is there a group of opinion and thought leaders actively participating in discussion? Then I want to be there. Odds are, if they’re talking about something, that ‘something’ will soon be in my world and I’m better off knowing about it now.
- A large community. Bigger can be better, especially if they’re participating, and you’ve got a particular issue or question you’d like opinions about.
- Smart social media tools. Having tools that easily enable network building and maintenance is key. Allow me to import my address books, search out all my other social media sites and allow me to invite friends to this one. Make it easy for me to find, add and communicate with friends, and you’ll have sold me.
- Site theme or purpose. Why are you networking and connecting? How does it support your business strategy? Answer these questions and you’ll understand why an economics professor wishing to extend his professional network wouldn’t sign up to a music-oriented social media site (unless he’s interested in music too, but then that’s not professional interest, as I see it). Basically, it’s not where his audience is, nor is it where he would get any reciprocal value — ie, what’s in it for me.
As I mentioned in the first paragraph, there are many sites now, so strategically selecting where you spend your time is key. I think I’ll settle into two or three sites professionally, but I’ll keep trying others, and may migrate from one to another depending on my needs.
That’s the beauty of this technology, new and better ways to communicate are being developed every day. I’m looking forward to a great ride.
So, these are my key criteria, what are yours? What networks do you use and why? Or why not?
FYI: This post started as a comment to Dan York’s Disruptive Conversations item: “Melcrum’s Communicators’ Network makes its debut — another social network for communications professionals”. Then it grew, took on a life of it’s own, and now resides here. Thanks for the inspiration Dan!
Technorati Tags: Social Media, Melcrum, Dan York, Evaluation, How To, Selection Criteria
Leave a Reply