What do you know, some rather bright computer scientists over at Queen’s University have used a computer progam to analyze recent campaign speeches.
…analysed the usage patterns of 88 deception-linked words within the text of recent campaign speeches from the political leaders. They then determined the frequency of these patterns in each speech, and averaged that number over all of that candidate’s speeches. Martin received a ranking of 124, while Harper and Layton scored 73 and 88, respectively.
Source: online edition of New Scientist.
Related posts:
- How to synchronize your podcast feeds on many computers Hello ther
- Wondering why people follow me on Twitter? Hello ther
- Telemarketing gains another enemy — the Canadian government Hello ther
- A few Twitter tips for TV media Hello ther



Comments on this entry are closed.